Clopton v. City of Forest Park, Georgia et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Northern District Clopton v. City of Forest Park, Georgia et al

Clopton v. City of Forest Park, Georgia et al

Plaintiff:	Alisha Clopton
Defendant:	City of Forest Park, Georgia
Case Number:	1:2009cv01367
Filed:	May 21, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Atlanta Office
County:	Clayton
Presiding Judge:	Forrester
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2010	Filing 21 OPINION and ORDER re 20 Status Report filed by City of Forest Park, Georgia. Because Plaintiff has dropped the federal claims in her amended complaint and because her state law claims should be heard by state courts, the court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's state law claims. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 5/3/10. (bse)
November 24, 2009	Filing 17 OPINION and ORDER granting 16 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. The proceedings in this case are STAYED until 4/1/10 (with one exception noted below). At that time, counsel for Defendant City of Forest Park, Georgia is DIRECTED to submit a status report to the court. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order. Defendants are not required to answer the amended complaint until the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 11/24/09. (bse)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2010

Filing 21 OPINION and ORDER re 20 Status Report filed by City of Forest Park, Georgia. Because Plaintiff has dropped the federal claims in her amended complaint and because her state law claims should be heard by state courts, the court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's state law claims. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 5/3/10. (bse)

November 24, 2009

Filing 17 OPINION and ORDER granting 16 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. The proceedings in this case are STAYED until 4/1/10 (with one exception noted below). At that time, counsel for Defendant City of Forest Park, Georgia is DIRECTED to submit a status report to the court. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order. Defendants are not required to answer the amended complaint until the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 11/24/09. (bse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clopton v. City of Forest Park, Georgia et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Clopton
Represented By:	Gary M. Shapiro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Forest Park, Georgia
Represented By:	Sun S. Choy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?