Cooksey v. Waters et al
| Johnny C. Cooksey |
| W. Michael Waters, Alexander, Royston, Hardman & Shinall, LLP, Allan Maxwell and Lora Maxwell |
| 1:2009cv01469 |
| June 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Rockdale |
| Story |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER finding as moot 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Stenographic Recording or Transcription from a Nonparty; finding as moot 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Prohibitive Injunction Relief; denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike; denying [2 5] Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Pleadings; denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; denying 33 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 35 Defendant Water's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 47 Alexander, Ro yston, Hardman & Shinall, LLP's Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court also notes sua sponte that no valid federal claim remains in this suit. Therefore, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and will DISMISS, without prejudice Plaintiff s remaining claims against Defendants Allan and Lora Maxwell. Additionally, this Court sua sponte dismisses Plaintiffs remaining claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/28/10. (cem) Modified on 9/29/2010 to add text regarding defendants Allan and Lora Maxwell. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
