Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. Silverton Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc.
Defendant: Silverton Financial Services, Inc., Silverton Capital Corporation, Silverton Bank, N.A. and Silverton Bridge Bank, N.A.
Receiver: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Silverton Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01583
Filed: June 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Forrester
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Set Aside Default. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file Defendant's answer as of the date of this order and CONSOLIDATE Civil Action No. 09-cv-1583 and Civil Action No. 10-cv-890. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 6/15/10. (bse)
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION and ORDER denying as moot Defendant's 7 Motion to Substitute Party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Silverton Bank, N.A. and denying as moot Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 8 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 12/1/09. (bse)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. Silverton Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silverton Financial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silverton Capital Corporation
Represented By: Ronald Thomas Coleman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silverton Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silverton Bridge Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Dean Richard Fuchs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc.
Represented By: Natasha Horne Moffitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Receiver: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Silverton Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Dean Richard Fuchs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?