Brilliant Alternatives, Inc. et al v. Feed Management Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert J. Brill and Brilliant Alternatives, Inc.
Defendant: Richard Reynertson and Feed Management Systems, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Feed Management Systems, Inc. and Richard Reynertson
Counter Defendant: Feed Management Systems, Inc. and Richard Reynertson
Case Number: 1:2009cv02348
Filed: August 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: Ward
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER granting Defendants' 127 Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, this suit is now limited to Defendants' counterclaims. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint, proposed pre-trial order within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/6/12. (cem)
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement their Opposition Brief 144 , 148 . Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's 117 Order 120 is DENIED, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery 121 is GRANTED i n part and DENIED, in part. Defendants are ORDERED to designate which documents are responsive to the 2008-2009 Distribution Networks FMS Products sales documents request and are ORDERED to produce the FMS Products sales documents for 2010-present within fourteen (14) days of this order. If Plaintiffs have any concerns with Defendants production, Plaintiffs must meet and confer. If that process does not yield positive results, the parties are to then call the Courts deputy clerk regarding the issue. Plaintiffs are NOT to file a motion to compel. As well, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 127 is GRANTED, in part. The Court RESERVES RULING on Plaintiffs fraud, accounting, punitive damages, and attorneys fees claims. After discovery closes, Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21) days to file a supplemental brief which solely discusses how Defendants amended discovery affects its fraud claim; Plaintiffs are not to restate any prior grounds or state any new arguments which do not relate to the new discovery. Following that supplemental brief, Defendants will have fourteen (14) days to file a response thereto. The parties (i.e., each side) will each be limited to ten (10) pages for the supplemental briefing. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/7/12. (cem)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER denying 74 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Non-Party Cargill and Plaintiffs' Motion for Oral Argument 78 . Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions against Non-Party Cargill, Reconsideration of the Protective Order, and Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 76 and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel the Defendants to Produce Their Privilege Logs 98 are GRANTED, in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motion 108 is GRANTED rendering Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Extend Time for Discovery 93 MOOT. Discovery is EXTENDED for 60 days from the date of this order. As a result, Defendants' First Motion for Summary Judgment 104 is DENIED, without prejudice, with right to refile. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/15/11. (cem)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 42 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 62 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Non-Party Cargill, Inc. However, this Court ORDERS Cargill to produce a privilege log in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. Lastly, Plaintiffs' 68 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is GRANTED. Discovery is extended through and including 6/14/2011. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 2/22/11. (cem)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 12/16/10. (cem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brilliant Alternatives, Inc. et al v. Feed Management Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Reynertson
Represented By: Steven L. Reitenour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Feed Management Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Shane V. Bohnen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert J. Brill
Represented By: G. Marshall Kent, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brilliant Alternatives, Inc.
Represented By: Tracy Allen Marion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Feed Management Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Michael David Hostetter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Richard Reynertson
Represented By: Michael David Hostetter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Feed Management Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Michael David Hostetter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Richard Reynertson
Represented By: Michael David Hostetter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?