Gelfond-Holtz v. The Harpagon Company, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Alicia Gelfond-Holtz
Defendant: Thomas Biggers, Bradley Hutchinson, The Harpagon Company, LLC, John E. Ramsey and Robert J. Proctor
Case Number: 1:2009cv03085
Filed: November 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Forrester
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Injunctions against fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION and ORDER. The court DENIES WITH LEAVE TO RENEW Defendant Hutchins' 9 motion to dismiss; GRANTS Defendant Hutchins' 10 motion for a more definite statement; DENIES WITH LEAVE TO RENEW Defendants The Harpagon Company, LLC, Thoma s Biggers, Robert Proctor, and John E. Ramsey's 12 motion to dismiss and GRANTS the motion for a more definite statement; and GRANTS Plaintiff's 15 motion for an extension of time to file response. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an amen ded complaint 20 days from the date of this order. The court expects the amended complaint to address the deficiencies noted in this order. The court also reminds Plaintiff that under the "shotgun pleading" jurisprudence of this circuit, this is Plaintiff's last opportunity to correct the problems in her complaint. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 6/25/10. (bse)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gelfond-Holtz v. The Harpagon Company, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Biggers
Represented By: Christopher Michael Porterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Hutchinson
Represented By: Russell Brevard Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Harpagon Company, LLC
Represented By: Christopher Michael Porterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Ramsey
Represented By: Christopher Michael Porterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert J. Proctor
Represented By: Christopher Michael Porterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Gelfond-Holtz
Represented By: Francis Xavier Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?