Sciele Pharma, Inc. v. Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Sciele Pharma, Inc.
Defendant: Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Counter Claimant: Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Counter Defendant: Sciele Pharma, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv03283
Filed: November 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Carnes
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 327 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part defendant Acellas 183 Motion to Compel; DENYING defendants 196 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Drs. Gregory and Armstrong; DENYING 197 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 198 Motion to Ex clude Evidence Relating to Product Testing; DENYING 199 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Reisetter; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 200 Testimony of Alisha Nielsen; DENYING 204 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 205 Motion for Partial S ummary Judgment; DENYING 206 Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Howard Zandman; DENYING 232 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 258 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 259 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 260 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING [2 61] Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 274 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 289 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 296 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 298 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 300 Motion to Seal Document; DENYING 313 Motion to St rike; DENYING 314 Motion for a Status Conference; DENYING as moot 326 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff shall produce the documents, and disclose the result of the inquiry, directed at page 11 of this Order, within 28 days of this date. Any further motions by Acella on this matter must be filed within 28 days after plaintiffs disclosures and production are complete. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 8/30/11. (ekb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sciele Pharma, Inc. v. Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sciele Pharma, Inc.
Represented By: Saul Perloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Represented By: Christopher Evan Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.
Represented By: Christopher Evan Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Sciele Pharma, Inc.
Represented By: Saul Perloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?