Minnifield v. Johnson & Freedman II, LLC
Plaintiff: Kimelyn A. Minnifield
Defendant: Johnson & Freedman II, LLC
Case Number: 1:2010cv00009
Filed: January 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Henry
Presiding Judge: Brill
Presiding Judge: Thrash
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 11/7/12. (dr)
August 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER approves and adopts the 19 Report and Recommendations as the judgment of the Court, denying as moot 2 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 8/13/10. (cem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minnifield v. Johnson & Freedman II, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimelyn A. Minnifield
Represented By: Kimelyn A. Minnifield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Freedman II, LLC
Represented By: John L. Bunyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?