Hobson v. C.U. Employment, Inc.
| James Hobson, Randy Fowler and Michael Cleveland |
| Communications Unlimited, Inc. and C.U. Employment, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv00734 |
| March 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Richard W. Story |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses; granting in part and denying in part 32 Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Discovery Responses; granting, as unopposed 40 Defen dant's Motion to Compel Arbitration. The Court RESERVES RULING on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Arbitration 28 and Plaintiffs Counsel is ORDERED to produce in camera his curative notice letter within seven (7) days of this Order. Until the Court can rule on the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Arbitration 28 , Defendants Motion to Stay Arbitrations of Alex Gordon and Michael Cleveland 46 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 2/7/11. (cem)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Defendants Emergency Motion to Cease and Desist Unauthorized Communication to Putative Class Members. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall be required to immediately make the changes detailed above to certain statements in future correspondence to putative class members. The Motion 20 is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/02/2010. (pdw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
