Mikell v. Terry
Petitioner: Joseph P. Mikell
Respondent: William M. Terry
Case Number: 1:2010cv00735
Filed: March 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: E. Clayton Scofield
Referring Judge: Thomas W. Thrash
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER adopting 15 Final Report and Recommendation, the Petition is DENIED and Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED on the issues of whether Petitioner is entitled to any relief on account of trial counsel's failure to adduce the testimony of Patel and Magby, and/or whether such claim is procedurally barred. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 12/12/12. (dr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mikell v. Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph P. Mikell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William M. Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?