T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Northern District T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia

T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia

Plaintiff:	T-Mobile South, LLC
Defendant:	City of Roswell, Georgia
Case Number:	1:2010cv01464
Filed:	May 13, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Atlanta Office
County:	Fulton
Presiding Judge:	Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	47 U.S.C. § 0332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 25, 2024	Filing 338 The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Substitution of Expert [Doc.332] and DENIES Plaintiff's Request for Reconsideration [Doc. 330]. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and submit a proposed schedule no later than April 8, 2024. The Court will conduct a phone conference with counsel on April 10, 2024 at 2:30 pm. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 03/25/2024. (amb)
March 17, 2023	Filing 287 OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on the 209 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment and the 186 MOTION for Summary Judgment or setting a date for resuming the previously continued evidentiary hearing until the parties have determined whether to p ursue an appeal. If any party decides to pursue an interlocutory appeal, Section 1292(b) requires that they file their application with the Eleventh Circuit within TEN days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. The Court therefore DIRECTS any part y who files an application for interlocutory appeal with the Eleventh Circuit to FILE A NOTICE on the docket to notify this Court of their pursuit of the appeal WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FILING THEAPPLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. Alternatively, if all parties determine after consideration of the Opinion and Order that they wish to continue with the next stages of proceedings in this Court, the Court will resume its previously continued evidentiary hearing applying the legal standard articulated in the 2016 MSJ Order. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 3/17/23. (jpa)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 25, 2024

Filing 338 The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Substitution of Expert [Doc.332] and DENIES Plaintiff's Request for Reconsideration [Doc. 330]. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and submit a proposed schedule no later than April 8, 2024. The Court will conduct a phone conference with counsel on April 10, 2024 at 2:30 pm. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 03/25/2024. (amb)

March 17, 2023

Filing 287 OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on the 209 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment and the 186 MOTION for Summary Judgment or setting a date for resuming the previously continued evidentiary hearing until the parties have determined whether to p ursue an appeal. If any party decides to pursue an interlocutory appeal, Section 1292(b) requires that they file their application with the Eleventh Circuit within TEN days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. The Court therefore DIRECTS any part y who files an application for interlocutory appeal with the Eleventh Circuit to FILE A NOTICE on the docket to notify this Court of their pursuit of the appeal WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FILING THEAPPLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. Alternatively, if all parties determine after consideration of the Opinion and Order that they wish to continue with the next stages of proceedings in this Court, the Court will resume its previously continued evidentiary hearing applying the legal standard articulated in the 2016 MSJ Order. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 3/17/23. (jpa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: T-Mobile South, LLC
Represented By:	Jonathan Tucker Barr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Roswell, Georgia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?