Siemens Industry, Inc. v. SIPCO, LLC

Siemens Industry, Inc. v. SIPCO, LLC

Plaintiff:	Siemens Industry, Inc.
Defendant:	SIPCO, LLC
Case Number:	1:2010cv02478
Filed:	August 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Atlanta Office
County:	Fulton
Presiding Judge:	Julie E. Carnes
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 23, 2013	Filing 156 ORDER AND OPINION denying defendants Motions for Reconsideration 148 and for Oral Argument 153 , granting plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 154 , and granting the Motions to Seal 147 , 149 , and 151 . To facilitate the resolution of the remaining issues, the Court directs the parties to participate in mediation as outlined in the Order. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 5/23/13. (ddm)
October 26, 2012	Filing 143 ORDER AND OPINION granting as unopposed the [110, 112, 134] Motions to Seal; granting 113 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 114 Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument; denying 122 Defendant's Motion for Summ ary Judgment; and denying as moot 133 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Declaration Testimony. Plaintiff should inform the court by November 5, 2012, whether it still itends to pursue Count II. Defendant is directed to inform the Court, by November 5, 2012, whether it intends to pursue the breach of contract claim. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 10/25/12. (ddm)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 23, 2013

Filing 156 ORDER AND OPINION denying defendants Motions for Reconsideration 148 and for Oral Argument 153 , granting plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 154 , and granting the Motions to Seal 147 , 149 , and 151 . To facilitate the resolution of the remaining issues, the Court directs the parties to participate in mediation as outlined in the Order. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 5/23/13. (ddm)

October 26, 2012

Filing 143 ORDER AND OPINION granting as unopposed the [110, 112, 134] Motions to Seal; granting 113 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 114 Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument; denying 122 Defendant's Motion for Summ ary Judgment; and denying as moot 133 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Declaration Testimony. Plaintiff should inform the court by November 5, 2012, whether it still itends to pursue Count II. Defendant is directed to inform the Court, by November 5, 2012, whether it intends to pursue the breach of contract claim. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 10/25/12. (ddm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siemens Industry, Inc. v. SIPCO, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Represented By:	Noah C. Graubart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SIPCO, LLC
Represented By:	John C. Herman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?