Habib v. Bank of America Corp.
Plaintiff: Rawshan Ara Habib
Defendant: Bank of America Corp.
Case Number: 1:2010cv04079
Filed: December 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Presiding Judge: Russell G. Vineyard
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendations, granting 3 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. The Plaintiff has 14 days to file an amended complaint; if he does not, the dismissal is with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 6/29/11. (dr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Habib v. Bank of America Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rawshan Ara Habib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America Corp.
Represented By: Brooke F. Voelzke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?