nVision Global Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 5, LLC
nVision Global Technology Solutions, Inc. |
Cardinal Health 5, LLC |
Cardinal Health 5, LLC |
nVision Global Technology Solutions, Inc. |
1:2011cv00389 |
February 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Henry |
William S. Duffey |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 235 OPINION and ORDER. Cardinal's Motion for Relief Under Rule 56(h) of the Fed.R.Civ.P. 192 is DENIED. Cardinal's Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 143 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED in favor of Cardinal on Cardinal's claim that (1) the number of self-invoice courier transactions must be calculated at the stop level, not the order level; (2) nVision is not permitted to charge Cardinal for flat file data feed and multiple line item data field cha rges, or other charges that are not included in the LSA; and, (3) that Cardinal has not retained or used any of nVision's trade secrets or proprietary information; and DENIED on Cardinal's claim that it is entitled to equitable reformati on of the agreement to reflect the parties' intended rate of $.02 per self-invoice courier transaction. It is further ordered that nVision's Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 148 and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Cardinal's Counterclaims of Fraud and Estoppel 206 are DENIED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. on 08/14/2012. (dfb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.