Slavic Evangelic Christian Church of Atlanta, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance
| Slavic Evangelic Christian Church of Atlanta, Inc. |
| Church Mutual Insurance |
| 1:2011cv03407 |
| October 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Gwinnett |
| Thomas W. Thrash |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Slavic Evangelic Christian Church of Atlanta, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Slavic Evangelic Christian Church of Atlanta, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tina L. Nicholson |
| Represented By: | Ellaretha Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Church Mutual Insurance | |
| Represented By: | Paul W. Burke |
| Represented By: | Chad Eric Jacobs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
