TAYLOR v. SCREENING REPORTS, INC.
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TAYLOR
Defendant: SCREENING REPORTS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2011cv03426
Filed: October 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gerrilyn G. Brill
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAYLOR v. SCREENING REPORTS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCREENING REPORTS, INC.
Represented By: John H. Bedard, Jr.
Represented By: Michael K. Chapman
Represented By: Joseph S. Messer
Represented By: Andrew M. Schwartz
Represented By: Nicole M. Strickler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TAYLOR
Represented By: James Marvin Feagle
Represented By: Geoffrey H. Baskerville
Represented By: James A. Francis
Represented By: Justin Tharpe Holcombe
Represented By: Kris Kelly Skaar
Represented By: John Soumilas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?