Adams v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joycelyn Adams
Defendant: Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., BAC, Bank of America, The Bank of New York Mellon and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv04263
Filed: December 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting Defendants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/9/2013. (cem)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is GRANTED with respect to Defendants MERS and BONY, against whom the Amended Complaint is dismissed in its entirety. GRANTED as to Countrywide and Ba nk of America on Count I to the extent claim is predicated on the allegation, contained in (paragraph 19 which is STRICKEN) of the Amended Complaint and DENIED as to remainder of Count I. GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim of Count II, to the extent the claim is based on the allegation, contained in (paragraph 25 which is STRICKEN) of the Amended Complaint, that Defendants Countrywide and Bank of America allowed other entities to foreclose. GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim of Count III but DENIED as to Plaintiffs claim of Count IV and lastly GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim for attorneys fees of Count IX. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 10/17/2012. (bdb)
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 8 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim for breach of contract (Count One) based on Defendants Countrywide and Bank of Americas alleged extraction of increased mortgage payments after Plaintiff had cure default. It is DENIED to the extent the breach of contract claim it rests on the allegation that Defendants Countrywide and Bank of America allowed other entities to foreclose when Plaintiff was no t in arrears. It is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count Two). It is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim for wrongful foreclosure (Count Five) to the extent the claim is based on Defendant s alleged breach of the duty to exercise fairly the power of sale. It is DENIED to the extent the wrongful foreclosure claim relies on Defendants alleged lack of standing to foreclose or the alleged invalidity of the Corrective Assignment. With regar d to Plaintiffs claims for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation (Counts Three and Four), the Court GRANTS Plaintiff fourteen (14) days TO AMEND the Proposed Amended Complaint to plead the alleged misrepresentations with greater particularity. Finally, Defendants Motion to Dismiss by Special Appearance 2 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 4/16/12. (cem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Lawrence Lublin
Represented By: Joseph Kelsey Grodzicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAC
Represented By: Joseph Kelsey Grodzicki
Represented By: Peter Lawrence Lublin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America
Represented By: Joseph Kelsey Grodzicki
Represented By: Peter Lawrence Lublin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Joseph Kelsey Grodzicki
Represented By: Peter Lawrence Lublin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Lawrence Lublin
Represented By: Joseph Kelsey Grodzicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joycelyn Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?