Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arrowood et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Earl C. Arrowood and Parker H. Petit |
| 1:2012cv00082 |
| January 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Hall |
| Richard W. Story |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER finding that Defendant Arrowood's attorney Mr. Cochran's statement to the Securities and Exchange Commission during plea negotiations are inadmissible against both Defendants. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/19/2014. (cem)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 100 Motion in Limine to exclude evidence of adverse consequences and remedies, and Plaintiff's 101 Motion in Limine to exclude character evidence is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/14/2014. (cem)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 76 Motion to File a Sur-Reply Brief. Defendants' 43 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The parties are ORDERED to submit a consolidated proposed pretrial order within thirty days of the docketing of this order. Mr. Arrowood's 41 Motion in Limine is GRANTED, and Mr. Petit's 42 Motion in Limine is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/7/2013. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
