Daker v. Dawes et al
| Waseem Daker |
| John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, George B. Hatfield, Gary Michael Lloyd and Cobb County |
| 1:2012cv00119 |
| January 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Cobb |
| Richard W. Story |
| E. Clayton Scofield |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER denying, for the reasons set forth in the discussion of the identical motions filed in 1:12-cv-118, Daker's 32 Motion to Reconsider Court's 1/16/2014 Order, Request for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal 37 , and Req uest for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal 38 , and Supplemental Motion to Reconsider Court's 1/16/2014 Order 40 . Once again, Daker is reminded that this Court's Local Rules prohibit the filing of motions for reconsiderat ion as a matter of routine practice and prohibit altogether the filing of "motions to reconsider the court's denial of a prior motion for reconsideration." LR 7.2E, NDGa. If Daker nonetheless seeks reconsideration of this Order and/or files any new requests to proceed IFP in this Court, he is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in those motions or requests why this Court should not exercise its "discretion to deny or revoke th[e] privilege [to proceed IFP]..., either retrospectively or pro spectively, by looking to 'the number, content, frequency, and disposition of his previous filings."" Hurt v. SSA, 544 F.3d 308,310 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Butler v. DOJ, 492 F.3d 440,445 (D.C. Cir. 2007)). In light of Daker's more than seventy prior cases and appeals, it may be appropriate for the Court to now exercise its "more general supervisory authority to manage [its] docket so as to promote[] the interests of justice,"" and to limit the waste of judi cial resources by prisoners "'for whom litigation [is] a costless pastime.'" Butler, 492 F.3d at 444-45 (quoting In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 184 (1989), and Ibrahim v. District of Columbia, 208 F.3d 1032, 1036 (D.C. Cir. 2000)). See also In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 180 (1991) (denying IFP status to a frequent filer in an extraordinary writ case and noting that he might be similarly restricted from filing IFP in other cases if he abused the privilege). Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 6/5/2014. (cem)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 21 Rule 59(e) Motion to Vacate 9/12/13 Order and Judgment and 22 Motion for Recusal and 22 Rule 59(e) Motion to Recuse Judge Richard W. Story and Motion to Vacate 9/12/13 Order and Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 1/16/2014. (anc)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER approving and adopting the 11 Final Report and Recommendation as its Order and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's 1 Complaint pursuant to Local Rule 41.3A(2). The Court DENIES Daker's 17 Motion for Consideration of Motion f or Reconsideration of IFP Status, as the motion for reconsideration referred to therein was previously denied. Daker is reminded that this Court's Local Rules prohibit the filing of motions for reconsideration as a matter of routine practice and prohibit altogether the filing of motions to reconsider the courts denial of a prior motion for reconsideration. Local Rule 7.2E, NDGa. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/12/2013. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
