Churchill Downs Incorporated v. Commemorative Derby Promotions, Inc. et al
| Churchill Downs Incorporated |
| Leonard Lusky and Commemorative Derby Promotions, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv00517 |
| February 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Jefferson |
| Julie E. Carnes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 86 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 8/7/14. (ddm)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER AND OPINION granting 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 67 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 38 Plaintif f's Motion to Supplement; denying 40 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 43 Defendants' Motion to Compel; and denying as moot 60 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. The Court o rders plaintiff to confer with defendants and thereafter to submit a draft order for a permanent injunction by October 28, 2013. Plaintiff shall also submit a brief on damages by the above deadline. Defendants shall respond by November 27, 2013. Plaintiffs reply will be due by December 13, 2013. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 9/23/13. (ddm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
