Pinder et al v. John Marshall Law School, LLC et al
| Scott Sigman and Kamina Pinder |
| John Marshall Law School, LLC and John Marshall Law School |
| 1:2012cv03300 |
| September 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Fulton |
| Justin S Anand |
| William S. Duffey |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER that the Defendant's 89 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's March 31, 2014 Opinion and Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 6/23/2014. (anc)
|
|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER that the Non-Final Report and Recommendation 79 is ADOPTED, and Defendant John Marshall Law School, LLC's Objections 82 are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 57 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED on all claims against Defendant John Marshall Law School. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 57 is GRANTED on Plaintiff Sigman's Title VII r etaliation claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 57 is DENIED on the Plaintiffs' remaining claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to File a Substitute Response, and a Substitute Statement of Material Facts 81 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/31/2014. (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
