Godwin v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mary Godwin
Defendant: Wellstar Health Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv03752
Filed: October 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER that Joint Exhibit J-25 is not admissible. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/3/2016. (anc)
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 95 OPINION AND ORDER on the parties' deposition designations and objections to deposition designations as to the deposition testimony of Kenneth Raymond Tifft. See Order for additional information. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/23/2016. (anc)
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff Mary Godwin's Motion in Limine 70 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED, and Defendant is precluded from making any statements relating to the claims dismissed at the summar y judgment stage of this action. Defendant also is precluded from presenting Linda Durham, Paula Arnett, and Phil Phillips as trial witnesses. Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED regarding Linda Durham, Paula Arnett, and Phil Phillips's personne l documents, subject to Plaintiff's objection to admission of the documents if Defendant seeks to introduce them at trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wellstar Health Systems,Inc.s Motion in Limine 71 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.Defendants Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is precluded from presenting:(1) the E-mails and Awards; (2) evidence that Plaintiff suffered emotional injury,pain and suffering, or mental anguish as a result of Defendants alleged conduct; and (3) evidence that insurance proceeds were not available under a policy on Plaintiff's spouse's life. With respect to Defendant's Motion to exclude "me too evidence," Defendants Motion is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff seeks to i ntroduce testimony about a witness's views and beliefs regarding the reasons for the witness's own termination. Defendant's Motion is DENIED to the extent Plaintiff seeks to introduce specific "me too" evidence and testimony that may show Brown's discriminatory animus. With respect to Defendant's Motion to exclude evidence of Brown's alleged fabrication of disciplinary forms and thatTrupiano knew of Plaintiff's age discrimination complaints to HR, Defendant's motion is DENIED. To the extent Defendant seeks to exclude evidence of claims dismissed on Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 11/18/2015. (anc)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/27/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Godwin v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Godwin
Represented By: Edward D. Buckley
Represented By: Justin M. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wellstar Health Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?