Shlikov et al v. Glass Mountain Capital, LLC

Plaintiff: Pavel Shlikov and Hanelle McCall
Defendant: Glass Mountain Capital, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00291
Filed: January 28, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Gwinnett
Referring Judge: Alan J. Baverman
Presiding Judge: Marvin H. Shoob
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shlikov et al v. Glass Mountain Capital, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pavel Shlikov
Represented By: Kris Kelly Skaar
Represented By: Justin Tharpe Holcombe
Represented By: James Marvin Feagle
Represented By: O. Randolph Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hanelle McCall
Represented By: Justin Tharpe Holcombe
Represented By: James Marvin Feagle
Represented By: O. Randolph Bragg
Represented By: Kris Kelly Skaar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glass Mountain Capital, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?