Anderson et al v. Southern Home Care Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Margaret Anderson, Mary Dixon, Kyonnie Sutherland and Latasha Williams
Defendant: Southern Home Care Services, Inc. and Res-Care, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00840
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 13 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to file, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, an amended complaint which complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Courts Local Rules. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/21/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson et al v. Southern Home Care Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Home Care Services, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew A. Boyd
Represented By: Ronald G. Polly, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Res-Care, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew A. Boyd
Represented By: Ronald G. Polly, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret Anderson
Represented By: Benjamin H. Terry
Represented By: Geoffrey Edward Pope
Represented By: John Marcus Edward Howard
Represented By: J. Derek Braziel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Dixon
Represented By: Benjamin H. Terry
Represented By: Geoffrey Edward Pope
Represented By: John Marcus Edward Howard
Represented By: J. Derek Braziel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyonnie Sutherland
Represented By: Benjamin H. Terry
Represented By: Geoffrey Edward Pope
Represented By: John Marcus Edward Howard
Represented By: J. Derek Braziel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latasha Williams
Represented By: Benjamin H. Terry
Represented By: Geoffrey Edward Pope
Represented By: John Marcus Edward Howard
Represented By: J. Derek Braziel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?