Graco Children's Products Inc. v. Kids II, Inc.

Plaintiff: Graco Children's Products Inc.
Defendant: Kids II, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv01183
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Julie E. Carnes
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 26, 2015 96 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Kids II, Inc.'s counterclaim for patent invalidity based on interfering subject matter. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 2/24/2015. (ss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graco Children's Products Inc. v. Kids II, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graco Children's Products Inc.
Represented By: Anthony B. Askew
Represented By: Gregory J. Carlin
Represented By: Walter Hill Levie, III
Represented By: Stephen M. Schaetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kids II, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.