Dunn-Carter v. Donahoe
Plaintiff: Pamela Dunn-Carter
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe
Case Number: 1:2013cv01489
Filed: May 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Julie E. Carnes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's 30 Motion to Amend Complaint is DENIED, Defendant's 33 Motion to Strike or, Alternative, Exclude from Consideration is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 3/30/2015. (cem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunn-Carter v. Donahoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Dunn-Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?