Brooks v. Lee
Petitioner: John Levi Brooks
Respondent: Denis B. Lee
Case Number: 1:2013cv02203
Filed: July 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Gerrilyn G. Brill
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER that the Final Report and Recommendation 5 is ADOPTED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 to move, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, for an order allowing a successive habeas petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Amend Petition 3 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 1/24/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Levi Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Denis B. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?