Dlamini v. Babb et al
Plaintiff: Thembi Dlamini
Defendant: Michael J. Babb and Juna G. Babb
Case Number: 1:2013cv02699
Filed: August 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER that Plaintiff Thembi Dlamini's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Court grants summary judgment for Plaintiff with regard to liability on Counts I, II, III, IV, and V in Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 34 Motion for Sanctions is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 11/5/2014. (anc)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER that Defendant Michael J. Babb's Motion to Deny Jury Trial, contained in his Motion to Deny Jury Trial Demand 13 , is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Michael J. Babb's Misjoinder Motion, contained in his Moti on to Deny Jury Trial Demand 13 , is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Defendant Michael J. Babb 20 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanct ions 26 , 27 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's request for an order compelling the production of discovery responses. It is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's request for sanctions. Defendan t Michael Babb is ORDERED to produce to Plaintiff's counsel, on or before July 18, 2014, his Rule 26(a) initial disclosures and his responses to the Michael Babb Discovery Requests. Defendant Juna Babb is ORDERED to produce to Plaintiff' s counsel, on or before July 18, 2014, her Rule 26(a) initial disclosures and her responses to the Juna Babb Discovery Requests. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Discovery Period 25 and Defendant Juna Babb's Mo tion for Extension of Time to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion, Written Discovery, and Submit Initial Disclosures 31 are GRANTED IN PART. The discovery deadline in this matter is extended through July 18, 2014, for the sole purpose of allowing De fendants to make their Rule 26(a) initial disclosures and to produce their responses to Plaintiffs Discovery Requests. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 6/20/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dlamini v. Babb et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juna G. Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thembi Dlamini
Represented By: Aaron Joshua Ross
Represented By: Audra Ann Dial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?