Kendall et al v. Sutherland et al
Jessica Kendall, Kimberly McLaughlin, Stacey Michelle Mitchell, Elizabeth Daley and Alexzandrea Brooks |
Alvin Sutherland, Kristopher Travitz, Neil Warren and Cobb County Georgia |
1:2013cv04263 |
December 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Pulaski |
Richard W. Story |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER denying as moot Plaintiffs' 109 Motion to Compel; denying Plaintiffs' 108 Motion for Leave to File and 112 Motion to Compel; granting Sheriff Warren's 115 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are ORDERED to submit a proposed consolidated pretrial order within 30 days. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 03/31/2016. (rsg) |
Filing 51 ORDER: Defendant Cobb County's Motion to Dismiss 18 is GRANTED, Defendant Sheriff Warren's Motion to Dismiss 19 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint 27 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Defendant WellStar's Motion for Reconsideration 47 is DENIED. Cobb County is hereby DISMISSED from this action, and all claims against Sheriff Warren are DISMISSED except for Plaintiffs Kendall, McLaughlin, and Brooks's § 1983 deliberate indifference claim against him in his individual capacity. Plaintiffs may proceed on their Second Amended Complaint 26 for the purposes of their deliberate indifference claim. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/5/2014. (cem) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.