Ealey v. Gramiak
Petitioner: Val Ealey
Respondent: Tom Gramiak
Case Number: 1:2014cv00418
Filed: February 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Dooly
Presiding Judge: Walter E. Johnson
Presiding Judge: Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: The Court OVERRULES the Objections 17 , ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 15 as the opinion and order of the Court, GRANTS respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Claims Challenging the 2009 Guilty Plea Conviction as Untimely 11 , DENIES the Amended Petition 6 , and DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/12/2014. (cem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ealey v. Gramiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Gramiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Val Ealey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?