McCavey v. Gold et al
| William M. McCavey |
| Howard Drutman, Charles L. Ruffin, John Eaves, Gail S. Tusan, Bensonetta T. Lane, Georgia Lord, Cynthia D. Wright, Gary Markwell & PC, Marsha Debra Gold and Doe Insurer |
| 1:2014cv00890 |
| March 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 6 , 8 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 24 and 41 . Plaintiff's Complaint 1 and Amended Complaint 30 are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants' Motion to Strike 38 is DENIED as moot. Defendant Marsha Debra Gold's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions 43 is GRANTED. Defendant may file with the Court, within fifteen (15) days, affidavits and other material in support of its claim for legal fees and expenses incurred as a result of Plaintiff's Rule 11 violation. Plaintiff may respond within fifteen (15) days thereafter. Plaintiff is also DIRECTED to file with his responses in this Court evidence of his financial condition, including current income from employment and any other sources and current amount of money in any checking and savings accounts. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 1/20/2015. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
