The Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Menchion et al
| The Cadle Company II, Inc. |
| Kenneth Menchion, Padrica Menchion, The Best Service Co., Inc. and Prime Asset Fund V, LLC |
| The Best Service Co., Inc., Kenneth Menchion and Padrica Menchion |
| Prime Asset Fund V, LLC and The Best Service Co., Inc. |
| The Best Service Co., Inc., Kenneth Menchion and Padrica Menchion |
| The Cadle Company II, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv01418 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Thomas W. Thrash |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER AND OPINION granting Defendants The Best Service Co., Inc., Padrica Menchion and Kenneth Menchions Motion for Summary Judgment 107 and granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 108 . Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 12/2/15. (ddm)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 37 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 46 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 62 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 19 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 10/6/2014. (ss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
