Gray v. Olens
Plaintiff: Christopher Jason Gray
Defendant: Samuel S. Olens
Case Number: 1:2014cv01895
Filed: June 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the 3 Final Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED in forma pauperis status. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court CERTIFIES that Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 9/24/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Jason Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel S. Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?