Peterson et al v. Aaron's, Inc. et al
| Michael Peterson and Matthew Lyons |
| Aaron's, Inc. and Aspen Way Enterprises, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv01919 |
| June 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Thomas W. Thrash |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Defendant Aaron's 144 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Aspen Way's 152 Motion is GRANTED in part as it relates to the Plaintiff Peterson's claims, but DENIED in part as it relates to the Plaintiff Lyons' claims for intrusion upon seclusion. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 10/3/17. (jkl)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER denying 84 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 1/24/2017. (ss)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, granting 52 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 9/15/15. (dr)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Defendant Aspen Way's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 26 Defendant Aaron's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 6/3/2015. (ss)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 1/15/2015. (ss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
