Jordan v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al
| Michelle Jordan |
| Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and Comcast of Florida/Georgia/Illinois/Michigan, LLC. |
| 1:2014cv03622 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Clayton |
| Russell G. Vineyard |
| William S. Duffey |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and Comcast of Florida/Georgia/Illinois/Michigan LLC's Motion to Quash Subpoenas 43 ("Motion to Quash") is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 10/11/2016. (bgt)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC's and Comcast of Florida/Georgia/Illinois/Michigan LLC's Emergency Motion for an Immediate Stay and for Leave to File a Motion to Compel Arbitration 26 is GRAN TED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration 26 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Michelle Jordan's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 24 is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/4/2016. (anc)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER DENYING 15 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 7/9/2015. (adg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
