Banegas et al v. Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc. et al
| Leonel Banegas, Mariela Mejia, Zeluma Mendoza and Karla Montalvan |
| Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc., Saucedos Drywall LLC and Timothy S. Looney |
| 1:2015cv02674 |
| July 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Fulton |
| William S. Duffey |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER granting 15 Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment as to Saucedos Drywall LLC and Timothy S. Looney d/b/a Pioneer Development. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants Saucedos Drywal l LLC and Timothy S. Looney d/b/a Pioneer Development, jointly and severally, in the following amounts: (1) damages in the amount of $16,500, which represents $8,250 in unpaid wages and $8,250 in liquidated damages, (2) costs in the am ount of $400; and (3) post-judgment interest, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, to accrue at the rate provided for in Section 1961 from the date of entry of final judgment by the Clerk to the date of payment. Plaintiffs request for leave to submit a petition for attorneys fees and costs is granted. Plaintiffs shall submit their petition for attorneys fees and costs on or before October 21, 2016. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 9/22/16. (ddm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
