Carzell et al v. Life of the South Insurance Company et al
| Marquetta Carzell, Luella Carter and Gladys Chege |
| Life of the South Insurance Company and Insurance Company of the South |
| 1:2015cv03260 |
| September 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Cobb |
| William S. Duffey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Surreply 17 is GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand 4 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/26/2016. (anc)
|
|
Filing
12
OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants Life of the South Insurance Company and Insurance Company of the South's Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Motion to Remand Exhibits Under Seal 11 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRAN TED to allow the redaction of social security numbers, birth dates, and the names of individuals known to be minors, except Defendants must leave un-redacted: the last four digits of the social security number, the year of the individual's birth, and the initials of the minor. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 10/19/2015. (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
