McAdoo v. The Metropolitan Atlanta Transit Authority et al
Plaintiff: Phillip McAdoo
Defendant: The Metropolitan Atlanta Transit Authority, The MARTA / ATU Local 732 Employees Retirement Plan and The MARTA / ATU Local 732 Employees Retirement Plan Allowance Committee
Case Number: 1:2016cv00734
Filed: March 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Referring Judge: John K Larkins
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER not adopting Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins IIIs Final Report and Recommendation 35 . Plaintiffs Objection 43 to the Magistrate Judges R&R on MARTAs Motion to Dismiss and his Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer Motion Not to Dismiss 44 are denied as moot. It is further ordered that Plaintiff shall, on or before May 12, 2017, provide the Court the following: (1) a statement indicating whether he intends to proceed pro se in this matter and (2) a single address to wh ich the clerks office will send filings in this matter. If Plaintiff subsequently changes the address to which he wants mailings sent, he must file a notice of change of address seven calendar days before he wants the change of address to go into effect. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/26/17. (ddm)
March 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins IIIs Non-Final Report and Recommendation 24 and overruling Plaintiff Phillip McAdoos Objections to the R&R 29 . Defendant MARTAs Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 14 , which the Court recharacterizes as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is granted and MARTA is dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/10/17. (ddm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McAdoo v. The Metropolitan Atlanta Transit Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip McAdoo
Represented By: Jacqueline K. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Metropolitan Atlanta Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The MARTA / ATU Local 732 Employees Retirement Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The MARTA / ATU Local 732 Employees Retirement Plan Allowance Committee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?