Conde v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Northern District Conde v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728

Conde v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728

Plaintiff:	Lauretta D. Conde
Defendant:	International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728
Case Number:	1:2017cv00078
Filed:	January 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Atlanta Office
County:	De Kalb
Presiding Judge:	J. Clay Fuller
Presiding Judge:	Thomas W. Thrash
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2017	Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING 38 Report and Recommendation, DENYING AS MOOT 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, DISMISSING 20 Amended Complaint, DENYING 23 & 24 Motions to Strike, DENYING 28 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING 33 Motion for Review of Court Order; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 35 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA retaliation claims against Defendant Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 728 are allowed to proceed. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 11/20/17. (jkl)
April 17, 2017	Filing 21 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 8 Non-Final Report and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs ADA discrimination and retaliation claims and her Title VII and ADEA discrimination claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 4/17/17. (jkl)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2017

Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING 38 Report and Recommendation, DENYING AS MOOT 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, DISMISSING 20 Amended Complaint, DENYING 23 & 24 Motions to Strike, DENYING 28 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING 33 Motion for Review of Court Order; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 35 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA retaliation claims against Defendant Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 728 are allowed to proceed. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 11/20/17. (jkl)

April 17, 2017

Filing 21 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 8 Non-Final Report and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs ADA discrimination and retaliation claims and her Title VII and ADEA discrimination claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 4/17/17. (jkl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conde v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauretta D. Conde
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 728
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?