Goodman v. The Housing Authority of DeKalb County et al
| Angela Goodman |
| The Housing Authority of DeKalb County and Eugene Walker |
| 1:2017cv00504 |
| February 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| De Kalb |
| Thomas W. Thrash |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 72 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants' 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ms. Goodman is entitled to summary judgment on her Fourteenth Amendment due process claim, as well as her claim under the Due Process Clause of the Georgia Constitution. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the Plaintiff's fourth claim for discrimination on the basis of disability. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 8/17/18. (jkl)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER re 3 Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Angela Goodman, 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Interlocutory Injunction filed by Angela Goodman. The Court GRANTS Goodmans motion for injunctiv e relief. The Court orders HADC to immediately reinstate Goodmans Section 8 voucher and to provide her with all other benefits to which she is entitled under the program until this case can be fully adjudicated. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 2/23/2017. (ss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
