Holt v. Metro Corral Partners, LLC et al
| Dakota Holt |
| Best 5 LLC and Metro Corral Partners, LLC |
| 1:2017cv03017 |
| August 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Cobb |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Dakota Holt (Rothschild, Corey) |
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #16 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(i). (jtj) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (jtj) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement by Dakota Holt (Ehrlich, Craig) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Persons by Metro Corral Partners, LLC. (Austin, Porsche) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Of Filing Certificate of Compliance by Metro Corral Partners, LLC re #4 Order, (Austin, Porsche) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Porsche D. Austin on behalf of Metro Corral Partners, LLC (Austin, Porsche) |
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant Best 5 LLC only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(i). (jtj) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice as to Defendant Best 5 LLC only filed by Dakota Holt (Ehrlich, Craig) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Dakota Holt. Metro Corral Partners, LLC waiver mailed on 8/29/2017, answer due 10/30/2017. (Rothschild, Corey) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Best 5, LLC shall have until October 10, 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 9/14/2017. (jtj)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Defendant Best 5, LLC Only by Dakota Holt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ehrlich, Craig) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Dakota Holt. Best 5 LLC served on 8/21/2017, answer due 9/11/2017. (Rothschild, Corey) |
| Submission of #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Defendant Best 5, LLC Only, submitted to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (jtj) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons by Dakota Holt. (Rothschild, Corey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Certificate of Compliance re: Standing Order in Cases Proceeding Before the Honorable Amy Totenberg by Dakota Holt re #4 Order, (Rothschild, Corey) |
|
Filing 4
Standing Order: Guidelines to Parties and Counsel Proceeding Before the Honorable Amy Totenberg. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto.To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 8/14/2017. (jtj)
|
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Best 5 LLC. (dfb) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Metro Corral Partners, LLC. (dfb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dakota Holt. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 113E-7318896.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dfb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
