Mike's Carpets of Virginia, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mike's Carpets of Virginia, Inc.
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Case Number:
1:2018cv00126
Filed:
January 9, 2018
Court:
Georgia Northern District Court
Office:
Atlanta Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Mark H. Cohen
Nature of Suit:
Insurance
Cause of Action:
28:1332
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mike's Carpets of Virginia, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mike's Carpets of Virginia, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Tatum Gholston |
| Represented By: | Barry Lewis Zimmerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
