NORTH AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. ECLIPSE ACQUI INC.
North American Communications Inc., NAC LOGISTICS, LLC, HMS GLOBAL DIRECT, LLC and HMS GLOBAL DIRECT 2, LLC |
ECLIPSE ACQUI INC. |
Arthur H Stroyd |
1:2018cv00490 |
January 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Amy Totenberg |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of Eclipse's Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3), which the Court also construes as a motion to transfer venue, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is HEREB Y ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will GRANT in PART, and DENY in PART, Eclipse's motion (ECF No. 8 ). Specifically, the Court will DENY Eclipse's Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3). However, the Court will GRANT Eclipse's motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of Georgia. Accordingly, this action at Docket No. 3:17-cv-167 is HEREBY TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Georgia. The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Northern District of Georgia, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 1/31/2018. (dlg) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 1/31/2018.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.