S.B. v. Mechanicsville Apartments Phase 4, L.P. et al
S.B. |
Housing Authority of The City of Atlanta, Mechanicsville Apartments Phase 4, L.P. and Columbia Residential, LLC |
1:2018cv03236 |
July 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Fulton |
Thomas W Thrash |
Linda T Walker |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by S.B. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion for Permission to Proceed Anonymously, #4 Brief in Support of Motion to Proceed Anonymously, #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #6 Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #7 Exhibit A - S.B. Declaration, #8 Exhibit B - 2018-02-15 ADA RAR to Mechanicsville Station, #9 Exhibit C - 2018-03-13 Aff of Dispo and 2018-02-19 Vol Dis, #10 Exhibit D - 2018-05-03 ADA RAR to Columbia Res, #11 Exhibit E - 2018-03-18 TANF ADA checklist and Service Plan, #12 Exhibit F - 2018-05-14 Letter from M Breedlove re RAR, #13 Exhibit G - 2018-05-23 Letter to M Breedlove, #14 Exhibit H - 2018-06-05 Email exchange with AHA's David Langford, #15 Exhibit I - 2017-08-14 Letter from GVRA re S.B. priority)(jkl) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker for IFP review. (jkl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.