Preston v. Coleman
| Sherry Preston |
| Rahsean Coleman |
| 1:2018cv03739 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Gwinnett |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certified copy of #5 Order mailed to the Clerk of Court, Magistrate Court of Clayton County. (tcc) |
Filing 5
ORDER APPROVING the magistrate judge's #3 Final Report and Recommendation and ADOPTING it as the opinion and order of this court, and REMANDING this action to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 8/27/2018. (tcc)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tcc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rahsean Coleman, Sherry Preston re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Letter. (tcc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rahsean Coleman, Sherry Preston re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation and Order on IFP. (rjs) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 8/7/2018. (rjs)
|
| Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal RECOMMENDING that the action be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 8/7/2018. (rjs) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Rahsean Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rjs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
ORDER (found in the #3 R&R) granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of this action only. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 8/7/2018. (rjs)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (btql) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rahsean Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(btql) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Preston v. Coleman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherry Preston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rahsean Coleman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
