Marshall v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kattie Marshall
Defendant: John Does 1-25, Trans Union, LLC and Synchrony Bank
Case Number: 1:2018cv03954
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Mark H Cohen
Referring Judge: Catherine M Salinas
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER by docket entry only GRANTING #10 Defendant Trans Union LLC's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Trans Union, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through 10/31/2018. SO ORDERED by United States Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/16/2018. (sal)
October 15, 2018 Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Trans Union, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Merar, Michael)
October 10, 2018 Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, until October 30 by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order to extend response time)(Gilroy, Monica)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER by docket entry only GRANTING #9 Consent Motion for Second Extension of Time for Defendant Synchrony Bank to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Synchrony Bank to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through 10/30/2018. SO ORDERED by United States Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/10/2018. (sal)
September 25, 2018 Clerks Notation re #8 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Synchrony Bank identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank. (Gilroy, Monica)
September 24, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, until October 16, 2018 by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order approving extension of time to answer)(Gilroy, Monica)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER by docket entry only GRANTING #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Synchrony Bank to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Synchrony Bank to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through 10/16/2018. SO ORDERED by United States Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 9/24/2018. (sal)
September 20, 2018 Clerks Notation re #6 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb)
September 13, 2018 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons by Kattie Marshall. (Mason, Jonathan)
September 13, 2018 Clerks Notation re #5 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER by docket entry only GRANTING #4 Defendant Trans Union LLC's Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Defendant Trans Union, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through 10/17/2018. SO ORDERED by United States Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 9/12/2018. (sal)
September 11, 2018 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trans Union, LLC identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC. (Merar, Michael)
September 11, 2018 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Trans Union, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Merar, Michael)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Synchrony Bank. (btql)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Trans Union, LLC. (btql)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kattie Marshall. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8091092) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(btql) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kattie Marshall
Represented By: Jonathan Braxton Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trans Union, LLC
Represented By: Michael Adam Merar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Represented By: Monica Kocurek Gilroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?