Landaverde v. Protective Insurance Company
Jose Landaverde |
Protective Insurance Company |
1:2018cv04047 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant Protective Insurance Company by Jose Landaverde.(Mendicino, Derek) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for First Interrogatories to Defendant Protective Insurance Company by Jose Landaverde.(Mendicino, Derek) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for First Request for Admissions to Defendant Protective Insurance Company by Jose Landaverde.(Mendicino, Derek) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RULE 5.4 Notice of Service of Discovery by Protective Insurance Company.(Wingfield, Thomas) |
Filing 9 Initial Disclosures by Jose Landaverde.(Mendicino, Derek) |
Filing 8 NOTICE Of Filing Initial Disclosures by Jose Landaverde (Mendicino, Derek) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Of Filing by Protective Insurance Company Defendant's Notice Of Filing Initial Disclosures (Wingfield, Thomas) |
Filing 6 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Jose Landaverde. (Mendicino, Derek) |
Clerks Notation re #5 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Jose Landaverde. (Mendicino, Derek) |
Clerks Notation re #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 9/5/18. (bnw) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Protective Insurance Company by Protective Insurance Company.(Wingfield, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Defendant Protective Insurance Defenses and ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Protective Insurance Company. Discovery ends on 1/28/2019.(Wingfield, Thomas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Protective Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113E-8106973) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Landaverde v. Protective Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jose Landaverde | |
Represented By: | Derek A. Mendicino |
Represented By: | Jorge Luis Flores, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Protective Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Carey Michael Johnson |
Represented By: | Thomas Kearney Wingfield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.