Barry v. Global Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dr. Mark A. Barry
Defendant: Globus Medical, Inc.
Respondent: 4Spine, LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv04058
Filed: August 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Referring Judge: Catherine M Salinas
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2018 New Civil Action Number in USDC EDPA 2:18-cv-3709 (aar)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the pending motion to compel be transferred to the issuing court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f). The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 8/29/2018. (rjs)
August 29, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas terminated from case. (rjs)
August 29, 2018 Case electronically transferred to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (rjs)
August 28, 2018 Submission of #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (rjs)
August 27, 2018 Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas: Telephone Conference held on 8/27/2018 regarding discovery dispute. (Tape #FTR)(rjs)
August 27, 2018 Case reported statistically. Matter transferred from 1:18-mi-88-SCJ. (rjs)
August 24, 2018 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #2 APPLICATION for Admission of Geng Chen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8093544). Attorney David Franklin Cooper added appearing on behalf of Globus Medical, Inc. (jkm)
August 23, 2018 Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena filed by 4Spine, LLC. (Cooper, David)
August 21, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Admission of Geng Chen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8093544)by Globus Medical, Inc.. (Cooper, David)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena served upon 4Spine, LLC with Brief In Support by Dr. Mark A. Barry. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration of A. Rinehart, #3 Exhibit -A, #4 Exhibit -B, #5 Exhibit -C, #6 Exhibit -D, #7 Exhibit -E, #8 Exhibit -F, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barry v. Global Medical, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: 4Spine, LLC
Represented By: David Franklin Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. Mark A. Barry
Represented By: Mitchell Gaines Stockwell
Represented By: David C. Holloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Globus Medical, Inc.
Represented By: Geng Chen
Represented By: David Franklin Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?