Sulbaran Henao et al v. Feretto Co., Inc. et al
Hever Augusto Sulbaran Henao and Roberto Rios Jesus Cruz |
Rudolf Caloian, Rudy & Services, LLC, Toma Both, Underground Network Solutions, LLC and Feretto Co., Inc. |
1:2018cv04111 |
August 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Labor: Fair Standards |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL IN CASES PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/9/2018. (cmd) |
Filing 7 NOTICE REGARDING FLSA CASES. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/9/2018. (cmd) |
Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Rudolf Caloian. (eop) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Toma Both. (eop) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Rudy & Services, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Underground Network Solutions, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Feretto Co., Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hever Augusto Sulbaran Henao and Roberto Rios Jesus Cruz. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8114113) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.