James v. United States of America
| Tony James |
| United States of America |
| 1:2018cv04298 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Richard W Story |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certified Mail Returned Receipt re #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition sent to Warden, USP, Atlanta. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tony James re #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition. Clerk's Certificate of Certified Mail to Warden USP Atlanta the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition. Certified Mail Number 7008 2810 0001 8476 0558. (dgr) |
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a copy of the petition and this Order as follows: (1) by certified mail to Warden Harmon of U.S.P. Atlanta; and (2) by ECF notification to the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, by delivery to the Civil Process Clerks email box and the United States Attorneys Office habeas email box. Warden Harmon shall show cause within forty-five (45) days of the receipt of this Order why the writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 09/28/2018. (dgr)
|
| Submission of Fee Payment Received and #2 Order to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (bdb) |
| Filing Fee Paid: $5.00, receipt number GAN100106435 for Tony James. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tony James re #2 Order and if papplication. Notice of street name change for the Atlanta courthouse included. (jpa) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to send Petitioner an application for leave to proceed ifp. If petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he is ORDERED to either pay the $5 filing fee, or complete and submit the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 9/17/18. (jpa)
|
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tony James. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tony James | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
