Thomas v. United States of America
| Corey A. Thomas |
| United States of America |
| 1:2018cv04337 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Linda T Walker |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER for Service of #4 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 10/25/2018. (rjs)
|
|
Filing 4
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: Because Plaintiff did not comply with the Court's Order to either pay the filing and administrative fee or submit an IFP application proving his indigence, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any further filings by Plaintiff regarding his Court-ordered restitution should be filed in his criminal case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 10/25/2018. (rjs)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Corey A. Thomas re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #5 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rjs) |
| Submission of #2 Order to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (rjs) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Of Filing: Restitution and Filing Administrative Fee by Corey A. Thomas. (rjs) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Corey A. Thomas re #2 Order and an application to proceed IFP. Notice of street name change for the Atlanta courthouse included. (jpa) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the standard filing fee of $400.00 within 30 days, or submit an application to proceed IFP if he is financially unable to pay the fee. The Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that if he seeks and is allowed to proceed IFP in this action, he must nevertheless pay the $350 filing fee from his inmate financial account over time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 9/20/18. (jpa)
|
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, titled, Private Offset Bond, filed by Corey A. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corey A. Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
